Home > Automotive > Expert Contributor

Mexico’s Auto Parts Industry Must Look Through the Windshield

By Francisco Nicolas Gonzalez - Industria Nacional de Autopartes
Executive President

STORY INLINE POST

DIA assistant
Francisco Nicolas Gonzalez By Francisco Nicolas Gonzalez | Executive President - Mon, 09/07/2026 - 06:30

share it

Anniversaries invite us to look in the rearview mirror. For the National Auto Parts Industry Association (INA), our 65th anniversary gives us reasons to do so. Mexico has built one of the world’s most sophisticated automotive supply chains and today stands as the fourth-largest producer of auto parts worldwide. But if there is one lesson these six and a half decades have taught us, it is that this industry moves forward because it never stays still.

Electrification is advancing. Autonomous driving has shifted from the laboratory into real streets. Software, sensors, microprocessors, and artificial intelligence are changing the architecture of the vehicle. Sustainability is becoming part of the business model. At the same time, geopolitics, trade policy, and the search for more resilient supply chains are reshaping where companies invest and how they produce.

For Mexico, the question is no longer whether change is coming. It is what role we want to play in it. Mexico’s competitive advantage can no longer be explained mainly by cost. It increasingly rests on talent: technicians, engineers, researchers, and entrepreneurs who know how to turn complex designs into reliable products at scale. The opportunity now is to connect that talent to more design, engineering, research, and innovation carried out in Mexico. The gap between our extraordinary production capabilities and the technological development still concentrated abroad is precisely where one of our greatest opportunities lies.

This matters because the vehicle itself is changing. Traditional mechanical components will increasingly coexist with power electronics, battery management systems, cameras, sensors, semiconductors, control systems, cybersecurity, and software. Electrification will be important, but it will not be the only path. Hydrogen and other clean technologies may serve different segments. The future will be defined by our ability to participate across several technologies.

That transition cannot be limited to the largest companies. Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers, SMEs and startups must be able to convert their capabilities. Financing, training, certification, technology transfer and stronger links with universities will determine whether the transformation reaches the entire supply chain. Industrial change is strongest when it becomes an ecosystem. For smaller suppliers in particular, technological conversion will require financing, skills, and sustained support.

Regional Integration Does Not Mean Intellectual Isolation

North America will remain the strategic center of that ecosystem. The integration built over decades between Mexico, the United States, and Canada is difficult to replicate. Components, materials, engineering and production cross borders as part of one manufacturing system. Preserving certainty under USMCA and recognizing that integration as a source of competitiveness for the region will be essential.

But regional integration should not mean intellectual isolation. We must also understand what is happening in Europe, Asia, and Latin America; how critical-mineral supply chains are being rebuilt; where new mobility models are taking shape; and where technology partnerships can strengthen Mexican capabilities. Leaders in periods of disruption are rarely those who predict one future perfectly. They are those who prepare for several plausible futures and adapt quickly.

None of this will happen without the basics. Advanced manufacturing requires competitive and reliable energy. Electromobility requires charging infrastructure and stronger grids. Industrial expansion requires logistics, connectivity, and legal certainty. Innovation requires policies that reward investment and allow companies to plan. These are not separate conversations; they are the foundation of the next generation of the automotive industry.

We must also broaden the way we think about mobility itself. A vehicle is not an isolated product; it operates within a city, an energy system, and a social environment. More efficient, connected, autonomous, or shared vehicles can create enormous benefits, but technology alone does not solve congestion, urban design, or quality of life. The industry of the future will increasingly be asked not only to manufacture vehicles, but to contribute to better mobility systems.

The same broader perspective applies to sustainability. The challenge is not only what comes out of a tailpipe. Materials, manufacturing, recycling, energy use, and circularity across the vehicle’s full life cycle will matter more every year. Competitiveness and sustainability are becoming part of the same equation.

Evolving at the Same Speed as the Industry

At INA, our own institution must evolve at the speed of the industry we represent. Our role cannot stop at representation. We must be a technical interlocutor, a connector of companies and talent, a platform for innovation, and a bridge between industry and public policy. Strong industries need strong institutions capable of adapting and building consensus.

Sixty-five years ago, INA was created for an automotive industry that looked very different from today’s. Sixty-five years from now, mobility will look different again.

That should not make us cautious. It should make us more ambitious.

Mobility is one of the ways human beings connect, produce, exchange, and expand opportunity. Mexico has already proven that it can be indispensable to that system. Our task now is to ensure that we are not only manufacturing the mobility of the future, but also designing and shaping it.

You May Like

Most popular

Newsletter